Even as their country is falling apart around them, authorities in Paris are building their dystopian ideology around imagined threats
France must be prepared “to accept losing its children” at a time where Emmanuel Macron and his intrusive touch have forged an unsuspected spiritual bond with his Ukrainian counterpart.
The French president has achieved the almost mystical feat of making France and Ukraine one and the same.
While the European Union has no say in the Russo-American chess game, Macron and Zelensky are lost together in a ballet of gesticulations and waking dreams. Zelensky displays faith in victory amid corruption cases, and it must be admitted that the French government is perhaps the last bastion of illusions in Europe to maintain this mirage.
The promised arms deliveries? A veritable fable, they won’t happen for a decade. Economic exchanges? A tale whose tangible ending no one will ever see. As for the “vital strategy” regarding a landlocked Kiev 2,400 km away from Paris, it is more of a geopolitical fairy tale than a concrete plan for the future of France and its people. Ukrainian lands have been unknown to French interests for two millennia, except for having given Henry I a wife and for a bloody expedition under Napoleon III, when France, supporting an Ottoman and British project, lost 95,000 men in the Crimean War.
Emmanuel Macron is an ultra-presidential figure with a record-low popularity of about 11% as of October 2025. No question of resigning; he will remain comfortably installed until 2027. While his 9th government (in 8 years in office) is rocking in the darkest political, economic and social storm ever seen, Macron is playing the international card, distancing himself from French worries.
As French public debt soars to 115% of GDP, every last citizen, including newborns, is drowning in €50,000 of debt. Covid-19 is in the past, but they had to find a new pretext to distract the plebs, and mobilization against Russia is the new refrain.
The “Great Mute One” (a nickname for the French Army, in reference to its long-standing stance of neutrality and silence in all things),has never opened her mouth so much, but now, lacking an argument of authority, the government is taking out generals in uniforms. The newly appointed “CEMA” (Chief of the Defense Staff) shines above all. A colonel in 2009, he was promoted to general in 2018. He made his five stars during a speedrun under the Macron presidency; at this level, the army is necessarily political.
On November 18, he made a speech at the congress of mayors. A nice place to insisting on an alarmist manipulation and affecting the population as closely as possible: “We have all the knowledge, all the economic and demographic strength to dissuade the Moscow regime from trying to try its luck further” he said. “We are in the moment where we have to talk about it, we have to talk about it in your municipalities.”
A regime with 11% popularity should be careful not to give electoral advice to the mayors of France, and the axis of a military mobilization against Russia does not seem to be the most optimal way to win mayoral elections.
“Russia is preparing for a confrontation with our countries by 2030. It is organizing for this, it is preparing for it and it is convinced that its existential enemy is NATO, it is our countries,” he said, probably after reading a report by the RAND Corporation or Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) in the US – because France in its current sorry state is incapable of thinking for itself and therefore of producing a coherent strategic analysis.
Think-tank influence was then confirmed when he said: “The first objective I gave to the armed forces is to be ready for a shock in three, four years, which would be a form of test.” An assumption that can be found in the July analysis 2025 of the “Russian concept” published by the CNA.
Where the CEMA particularly provoked a stir was when he declared “If our country falters because it is not ready to lose its children, because we have to say things, to suffer economically (...), if we are not ready for that, then we are at risk.”
While people may tolerate vows of poverty, threatening what is most precious, the children and future, should be the last straw. Especially when it comes from a general whose role is that of technician and advisor, not spokesperson of a political agenda. This is a worrying case of political collusion between a discredited, rejected government and the highest-ranking military officer, one of whose civic duties is to remain politically neutral.
Even Ségolène Royal, former socialist minister under presidents François Hollande and François Mitterrand, strongly criticized the notion: “France will not accept to lose its children to a power that is drifting [...] The worst thing is that we are a few days after November 11, the end of the terrible butchery of the [1914-1918] war, the causes of which all historians point out.”
In France the population totaled around 68.6 million inhabitants in January 2025, with a very low growth of +0.25% over the year 2024. This increase was mainly due to net migration, which accounts for 90% of growth, while natural change (births minus deaths) accounts for only about 10%. The fertility rate is 1.62 children per woman, its lowest since 1919. In 2024, out of about 660,800 births in France, 34% or 224,672 babies, had at least one parent who was born abroad.
In France or the greater EU, already in advanced decline, never have so many powerful forces wished to lead a continent and its peoples towards destruction and extinction.
Operation destruction
But the Republic knows when and how it needs to mobilize its human resources. Macron and his servants, the media with their gaping mouths and indiscriminate bootlickers, repeat the refrain in unison, accusing anyone who questions them of being a pro-Russian traitor.
To come to the rescue of his superior, the colonel spokesman had to assert this during a press briefing: “A country that is not ready to understand this is a country that is weak,” he said with audacity, as if avoiding a nuclear winter were a sign of weakness.
The Republic has a principle: strong with the weak, weak with the strong. French people have been lectured for decades on republican morality while Paris resembles a dump. Families who do not want to send their children to war are weak, while the police cannot even control entire neighborhoods in the hands of drug dealers. All efforts must be focused on NATO’s eastern flank while the country is collapsing. This is the paradox of France.
The French Republic is as brazen and destructive as it has always been, whether through its “civilizing mission” in Africa during the 19th century or its centralization in France, destroying all regional particularities that had survived 2,000 years of history within a few decades. Today, in the space of eight years, Macron has destroyed French diplomacy, sullied its culture, and reduced the country’s economic competitiveness to nothing.
The naive view of the recently appointed Minister of the Armed Forces, Catherine Vautrin, tells it all (apart from the fact that her CV is unrelated to her job): “There is no room for controversy over statements taken out of context.” Yet the French people have not invented anything, the left and right-wing political opposition both the same thing; the mainstream media evoke the “Russian threat.”
The State is obese, and if it doesn’t have the French people’s money, it will take their children. Long live the Republic!
These gestures do not serve French interests, as France has always been perceived by the Anglo-Saxons as a rival country in Europe. Since 1945, all the contortions have never satisfied the Americans, who prefer to rely on their German vassals or the more bellicose Poles and Balts to shape the EU.
As the Chief of the Defense Staff has pointed out, France possesses nuclear weapons (for the moment, because there’s of course another project to share it with the EU), and thus is safe from a conventional confrontation, unless the president’s plan is to jump in with both feet in Ukraine or Taiwan within the next two years.
Every civil society must be aware of the world around it, but it also has to take care of itself. France should have thought twice before promoting castration-based wokeism and exacerbating feminism by firing the more “virile” executives in all civilian and military positions over the last 20 years. There are also more obvious reasons the threat to France comes from within rather than from the outside: economic, social, political or migratory.
Surviving in the Zone
The government has released a survival guide titled “We are all responsible.” It is a catch-all compendium of everything from combating disinformation and mistrust of opponents to preventing terrorism and natural disasters, including voluntary enlistment in the army or civil security. While the words “Ukraine” or “Russia” do not appear once, which is pleasing to see, the sudden media coverage of this guide just after the CEMA’s comments speaks for itself. The guide has been around since 2023, and no one cared about it until now.
Interestingly, when it comes to fighting against Russia or having abortions, the ethnic profiles on the booklets (the people targeted by the republican apparatus) are generally “very European.” In fact, all the people depicted in the booklet are white. What a surprise, when the Republic has bombarded the French with egalitarian principles and constantly promotes people and “things” of all colors, even blue or green if it could.
In the true spirit of equality, the Republic pisses everyone off equally, and the native French are no exception. Let’s remember that according to President Emmanuel Macron, “There is no single French culture, there is a culture in France, and it is diverse.” Indeed, when it’s time for Europeans to kill each other again, he must call upon native French people.
With Covid already shelved, the plebs are muzzled in the name of “facing Russia,” the government and its apparatus are mobilizing. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Ukraine is France. The dystopia of ideology has reached its peak.
